Page 15 - KNEETA
P. 15

KNEETA®  Medial-Pivot Total Tibial Tray Component


             Keel                                                  Size 1                 Size 6

             Proportional increase with sizes.
             The tibial stem of the KNEETA® Medial-Pivot Total Knee System has been made
             increasing proportional with the size. This allows for easier insertion for the
             smaller components of the range.
                                                                          35mm

                                                                                                   50mm











             Built-In Posterior Slope
                                                                                            Posterior
             Stem and keel incorporate 3° posterior slope.
             The KNEETA® Medial-Pivot Total tibial base keels are angled 3° posteriorly. This   6mm
             ensures that even if posterior slope is resected on the proximal tibia the keel is
             oriented properly down the cortex of the tibia. The thickness of the tibial base   4mm
             implant is 4mm. This number correlates to the thickness of the selected tibial
             insert thickness.
             For instance, if a 10mm thick insert is selected, the actual thickness of the
             bearing surface is 6mm. The 10mm thickness read on the label is actually a
             combination of the insert base thickness and the bearing surface thickness.

             The KNEETA® Medial-Pivot Total tibial inserts have 0° slope build into the implant:
             the articular surface is parallel to the bottom of the insert.


                                                                                    3° Posterior Slope




             REFERENCES
                1.  Pinskerova et al “The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaveric knee: a study using MRI as an anatomic tool” JBJS 82-B, (2000)
                2.
                3.  Anderson et al “Patellofemoral complications after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty” JoA 17, 4, 2002.
                4.
                5.  Kujala, U.M., Österman, K., Lormano, M., Nelimarkka, O., Hurme, M., Taimela, S.: Patellofemoral relationships in recurrent patellar dislocation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
             71B: 788, 1989.
                6.
                7.  Karachalios T. A mid-term clinical outcome study of the KNEETA® Medial -Pivot Total Knee arthroplasty. The Knee, 2009; 16(6): 484-8.
                8.  2010 Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register.
                9.  Feinstein WK. Anatomic alignment of the patella groove. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 331:64-73.
               10.  Lee TQ. Component positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;336:274-81.
               11.  Stiehl JB. Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(6):706-14.
               12.  Schmidt R,  Komistek RD,  Blaha JD, Maloney JW Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial-Pivot Total knee implants  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 May;(410):139-47.
               13.  WMT Internal Data.
               14.  Shakespeare D. Flexion after total knee replacement. A comparison between the Medial-Pivot Total knee and a posterior stabilised implant. Knee. 2006 Oct;13(5):371-3. Epub 2006 Jul 7
               15.  MicroPort Orthopedics Engineering Report, ER97-0059










                             SUNTEK                                                       KNEETA            R
                             Medical Devices
                             and Electronic                                             Total Knee system
                             Products Trade Co.      KNEETA® Medial-Pivot Knee System
                                                                                                                  15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20